Revision Of The Electoral College - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 1 Words: 430 Downloads: 3 Date added: 2019/05/23 Category Politics Essay Level High school Tags: Electoral College Essay Did you like this example? The Electoral College is the system in place in the United States that is used to elect the president every four years. Created by the founding fathers, the Electoral College was designed to avoid giving a large amount of power to the federal government by allowing the people to have a say in the election. However, because the founding fathers also did not believe the general public had enough knowledge to elect the best official for the office, they wanted to avoid leaving the election up to a popular vote. It was much harder for information to circulate in the 18th century, so the founding fathers wanted a system that allowed well-informed people to make the final decision for such a vital position. The Electoral College was meant to give power to the people, but only a limited amount. The main concern that led to the creation of the Electoral College is now obsolete. We now live in the information age, where any information regarding the candidates that isnt thrown in your face, is one click away. Because the population is able to make informed decisions for themselves, the Electoral College, as it was originally intended, has become outdated. However, this does not mean that the system has become obsolete. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Revision Of The Electoral College" essay for you Create order The main concern is now no longer an issue, but the Electoral College also has several benefits that do not relate to the knowledge of voters. Because the Electoral College helps to maintain the two-party system and helps to decrease the chance that a winner will be difficult to determine, it is not completely outdated. The Electoral College system is not a perfect system. It should be revised from its current state to give more power to the people in elections. The system should be revised so that not all of the electoral votes of a state go to the candidate who received a majority in that state. This could help increase voter turnout by making people in a state dominated by one party feel more represented. For example, the electoral votes from California almost always are received by the democratic candidate. However, if the system was revised, republican supporters in the state might have their votes better represented if a few of the electoral votes could go to the republican can didate. This revision would have the same effect on urban voters in Texas, who often vote for the democratic candidate, despite the state almost always giving its electoral votes to the republican candidate. If the Electoral College system was revised, more voters would have their voice represented in elections.

Necessity of Dropping the Atomic Bomb to End World War II

Professor Robert James Maddox argues that the atomic bomb was necessary to force the Japanese army to finally surrender and avoid a costly and heavy casualty war with Japan. On August 6, 1945, the United States dropped the first atomic bomb over Hiroshima, Japan. Three days after the initial bombing, another nuclear weapon was dropped on Nagasaki, a main Japanese city. President Truman and Professor Maddox both had the same belief that these bombs were crucial to Japan surrendering in the war. Maddox mentions that Japan was a beaten nation by the summer of 1945 and conventional bombings had reduced many of their cities to almost nothing. He goes on to say that although many rational calculations had Japan listed as a beaten nation, their military was fully prepared to fight and even claimed to encourage invasions in order to make the United States suffer severe casualties. With the use of kamikazes and even suicide missions to destroy American ships, the Japanese could be expected to defend their nation at virtually all costs and fight the war hard until it was over. The United States and President Truman declared that if Japan did not surrender, our nation would use the atomic bomb on their country. There were roughly 193,500 anticipated casualties and according to Robert James Maddox, these figures were never mentioned to President Truman. A second myth that has been circulating is that many of the President’s military advisers told him that the use of atomic bombs wouldShow MoreRelatedDid The Atomic Bomb Be End World War II?1115 Words   |  5 PagesDrop the Atomic Bomb to End World War II? Inventions have been accomplished due to the vast technology that is in place. Technology has led to the advancement of warfare in most parts of the world. The same technology has resulted in inventions that range from gunpowder to the atom that is splitting the environments across the borders. These inventions have led to some countries being able to leap over other weaker countries when it comes to war. Among all these inventions, the atomic bomb stands outRead MoreHarry S. Truman For Defeating Japan s Barbaric Regime And Ending The Bloodiest War1641 Words   |  7 PagesHarry S. Truman was forced to decide whether or not to drop the atomic bombs on Japan, the moral choice was clear: dropping the bombs was the most viable option available that would end World War II, minimize casualties on both sides of the war, and ensure American victory. Every other option available to Truman would have resulted in a much greater loss for the people of both Japan and the United States. While dr opping atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was undeniably an atrocityRead MoreEssay on Atomic Bombing on Japan937 Words   |  4 PagesHiroshima: Was Dropping the Atomic Bomb a Military Necessity? On the morning of August 6th, 1945 at around 8:16 a.m., the United States dropped the first bomb on Hiroshima. This bomb was given the nickname â€Å"Little Boy.† Three days after the first atomic bomb was dropped, on August 9th, 1945 at around 11:02 a.m., the United States dropped a second atomic bomb on Nagasaki. This bomb was given the nickname â€Å"Fat Man.† These two bombs immensely destroyed these cities and took the lives of many peopleRead MoreThe Atomic Bomb : Right Or Wrong1642 Words   |  7 PagesDr. Shedd 11/10/15 Word Count: 1517 The Atomic Bomb: Right or Wrong On August 6th, 1945 the very first atomic bomb was dropped on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. A second atomic bomb was dropped on the Japanese city of Nagasaki a few days later. This was the largest attack a country had ever seen before and there were many different views on whether the bombs were necessary or not. Like any conflict, there were groups that were against dropping the bomb such as the Wall Street Journal and groupsRead MorePresident Truman Made A Nuclear Weapon1745 Words   |  7 Pagesdropped a nuclear weapon on the Japanese city of Hiroshima, at the command of President Harry Truman. Then, on August 9, 1945 a second atomic bomb was dropped on Japan in the city of Nagasaki. President Truman made this choice in an effort to end World War II. World War II began on September 1,1939 and ended on September 2,1945 ending in an Allie victory. This world was fought primarily by the Axis Powers: Germany, Austria, Italy, and Japan and the Allie Powers: Great Britain, France, T he USSR, andRead MoreAtomic Bombs On Hiroshima And Nagasaki1074 Words   |  5 PagesThere are many different ways in which WWII could have ended. Rather than taking the risk of dropping atomic bombs on Japan, many people believe that one of the alternative options would have been much more sensible. The variety of possible options the U.S. could have taken to finish the war have been analyzed for years. Though Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bombs over Hiroshima and Nagasaki is one of the most controversial and debated topics in history, this researcher believes that he madeRead MoreWhy the Atomic Bomb Was the Wrong Choice Essay example1340 Words   |  6 PagesWorld War II played host to some of the most gruesome and largest mass killings in history. From the start of the war in 1939 until the end of the war in 1945 there were three mass killings, by three big countries on those who they thought were lesser peoples. The rape of Nanking, which was carried out by the J apanese, resulted in the deaths of 150,000 to 200,000 Chinese civilians and POW. A more well-known event was of the Germans and the Holocaust. Hitler and the Nazi regime persecuted and killedRead MoreThe Atomic Bomb Is Not A Military Necessity1210 Words   |  5 Pagesrevered American generals, Leahy, Macarthur, and Eisenhower, stated the dropping of the atomic bomb â€Å"was not a military necessity.† Japan was already struggling greatly to maintain itself, and they felt that it would fall soon. Leahy even went as far as to say that a continuation of the blockade of Japan and bombings would have been enough to bring Japan to its knees. These generals acknowledged the efficiency of the atomic bomb, but could not reconcile that efficiency to the devastating consequencesRead MoreJustified or Unjustified: America Builds the First Nuclear Weapon883 Words   |  4 PagesOn August 2, 1938, in the heat of World War II, Albert Einstein, a physicist born in Germany, sent a letter to Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the 32nd president of the United States. The letter suggested America to build an atomic bomb before the Nazi Germany does. However, it took more than two months for the letter to reach Roosevelt. On October 19, 1938, Roosevelt agreed, replying, â€Å"I found this data of such import that I have convened a Board †¦ to thoroughly investigate the possibilities of yourRead MoreThe Nuclear Bombing On World War II Essay2204 Words   |  9 Pages To what extent was the nuclear bombing on Japan necessary to end World War II Eric Leiva-Ochoa History Internal Assessment Word Count: â€Æ' Table of Contents Section 1: Identification and evaluation of sources†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦...†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.1 Section 2: Investigation†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.....†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦3 Section 3: Reflection†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦...†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦..†¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦.6 Works Cited †¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦Ã¢â‚¬ ¦......8 â€Æ' Section 1: Identification and Evaluation of Sources This investigation will explore

Taxation Travel Expense Deductibility

Question: Discuss about the Taxationfor Travel Expense Deductibility. Answer: The objective is to determine the deductibility of the travel costs for Jim who is a barrister and is engaged in income generating activities at two different locations. In accordance to Section 25.100, ITAA 1997 deduction for traveling expenses is available if the person concerned travels from one location to another if the following two conditions are satisfied (Barkoczy, 2015). When the taxpayer was present at the first location, he/she was engaged in commercial activities leading to assessable income. Also, when the taxpayer travels to the second location, then even at the second location, the taxpayer must be engaged in commercial activities leading to assessable income. It is noteworthy that if any of the places i.e. source or destination happens to be place of residence, then the travel expenses are not deductible (s. 25-100(3)). Additionally, travel expenses would not be considered deductible if at the time of travelling to the second place, the work or income producing activity at the first place has already finished (s. 25-100(4)) (Austlii, nd). Also, any travel expense which is of capital nature would not be deductible irrespective of the source and destination of the travel (s. 25-100(5)) (CCH, 2013). Scenario 1: As per the given scenario, Jim drives from his office located at the CBD to a court in Sydney suburb. In the given case, the deduction for travel expenses would not be available as Jim has finished his work at his work at the time of leaving for the court and afterwards returns home (s. 25-100(4)). No travel expense deduction is available for the travel between the court and home in accordance with s. 25-100(3). Scenario 2: As per the given scenario, Jim drives from the Sydney based office to Cooma farm and has not complete his work of the Sydney office yet and therefore is carrying a part of work to the farm also. It is apparent that Jim is travelling from one location where he is earning assessable income as a barrister to another place where he is deriving assessable income, Thus, in accordance with s.25-100(1), ITAA 1997, the travel expenses incurred would be deductible for tax purposes. Scenario 3: As per the given scenario, Jim travels from CBD based office to his residence. In accordance with s.25-100(3), ITAA 1997, the travel expenses incurred would not be deductible for tax purposes. It is also known that after coming home, Jim travels to the commercial establishment i.e. farm at Cooma. In accordance with s.25-100(3), ITAA 1997, the travel expenses incurred would not be deductible for tax purposes. Thus, in this scenario, as the source or destination of each of the trips is Jims residence, thus, the travel expenses incurred by Jim would not be deductible for the tax purpose. Reference Austlii (n.d.), Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 - SECT 25.100, Australian Legal Institute, [Online] Available at https://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/itaa1997240/s25.100.html [Accessed April 15, 2017] Barkoczy,S. (2015), Foundation of Taxation Law 2015, 7thed., North Ryde: CCH Publications CCH (2013), Australian Master Tax Guide 2013, 51st ed., Sydney: Wolters Kluwer